CMS's CY2027 PFS would halve the lower-cost same-day E/M or procedure, and turn G2211 into a modifier
CMS issued the CY2027 Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule on July 14, 2026. It would pay the lower-cost service at 50% when an E/M visit and a global procedure fall on the same day, convert the G2211 complexity add-on into a modifier, split advance care planning into practitioner and clinical-staff codes, and tighten remote monitoring. Comments close September 14. Here's what touches a coder's desk.
Reviewed by Jess P., CPC
Published July 18, 2026

Key Takeaways
- →CMS issued the CY2027 Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule on July 14, 2026, with policies effective on or after January 1, 2027 and a public comment deadline of September 14, 2026.
- →CMS proposes a CY2027 qualifying-APM conversion factor of $33.17, down $0.40 (-1.19%) from $33.57, and a non-qualifying-APM conversion factor of $32.84, down $0.56 (-1.68%) from $33.40, as the one-year 2.50% increase from Public Law 119-21 expires.
- →When a separately identifiable office/outpatient E/M visit is furnished on the same day as a 0-, 10-, or 90-day global procedure by the same physician or practice, CMS proposes to pay the most expensive service at 100% and every other same-day service at 50%.
- →CMS proposes to convert the E/M complexity add-on HCPCS code G2211 into a modifier that raises the associated E/M payment by 16%, plus a second modifier for Shared Savings Program and LEAD ACO practitioners that raises it by 32%.
- →CMS proposes two new HCPCS codes for clinical-staff advance care planning and would restrict CPT codes 99497 and 99498 to time the billing practitioner personally spends.
On July 14, 2026, CMS issued the CY2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule proposed rule, the annual notice that sets fee-for-service Part B payment and, along the way, moves a handful of coding rules that land straight on the coder's desk. Comments are due September 14, 2026, and the policies would take effect on or after January 1, 2027. Most of this is still a proposal, not settled policy. Read it now anyway, because two of the changes hit the highest-volume billing decisions a practice makes every day.
What the conversion factor does to CY2027 pay
By statute there are now two conversion factors: one for qualifying alternative payment model (APM) participants, one for everyone else. CMS proposes the numbers below. The decrease is not a new cut so much as the sunset of an old bump: Public Law 119-21, which CMS calls the Working Families Tax Cut law, gave a one-year 2.50% increase for CY2026 that no longer applies in CY2027.
| Conversion factor | Current (CY2026) | Proposed CY2027 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Qualifying APM participant | $33.57 | $33.17 | -$0.40 (-1.19%) |
| Non-qualifying APM | $33.40 | $32.84 | -$0.56 (-1.68%) |
A lower conversion factor lowers the payable amount on every service, so the coding changes below sit on top of an already-tighter baseline.
The same-day E/M and global-surgery change is the one to model first
For CY2027, CMS proposes that when a separately identifiable office/outpatient E/M visit is furnished by the same physician, or a physician in the same practice, on the same day as a 0-, 10-, or 90-day global procedure, the most expensive service is paid at 100% and every other surgical procedure or E/M visit that day is paid at 50%.
This one has the widest reach. It hits the modifier 25 scenario a busy procedural schedule bills all day long. CMS's read: when the same practice does the E/M and the procedure on the same day, the work overlaps, so paying both in full is "likely duplicating payment." It floated the same idea in the CY2019 proposed rule and backed off. This time it's proposed on its own.
G2211 becomes a modifier, and ACOs get a second one
CMS finalized separate payment for the office/outpatient E/M visit complexity add-on, HCPCS code G2211, in CY2021, delayed it, and implemented it for CY2025. For CY2027 it proposes to stop paying G2211 as a standalone code and instead recognize it as a modifier appended to the base E/M code. The modifier would raise the associated E/M payment by 16% across all E/M levels, a percentage instead of the current flat add-on amount.
There is a second, ACO-only modifier in the proposal. For practitioners in a Shared Savings Program ACO or a Long-term Enhanced ACO Design (LEAD) Model ACO, a separate modifier would raise the associated E/M payment by 32% to recognize longitudinal-care work. CMS describes it as voluntary and billable for all beneficiaries the ACO practitioner serves, not only assigned ones.
Advance care planning splits into practitioner and clinical-staff codes
CMS proposes to create two new HCPCS codes for advance care planning (ACP) furnished by clinical staff under the direct supervision of the billing practitioner, and to restrict the existing ACP codes, CPT 99497 and 99498, to time the billing practitioner personally spends. If your notes don't already flag who did the ACP work, start capturing that split now so the codes map cleanly if the proposal is finalized.
Remote monitoring tightens
CMS proposes several changes to remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) and remote therapeutic monitoring (RTM):
- RTM would be furnished only to established patients.
- A practitioner reporting RPM or RTM would have to furnish a separately reportable initiating visit at the onset of the service.
- Payment would be allowed only when the service is performed by clinical staff employed by the practice, not by contractors.
CMS also says it is considering bundling the RPM and RTM CPT codes and creating four new HCPCS G-codes for remote monitoring, an approach it links to recommendations from recent OIG reports. If a device vendor supplies the monitoring staff for your practice, the contractor limit is the line to read closely.
Other coding CMS is proposing to create
A few smaller items round out the coding-relevant proposals:
- Shared medical appointments. No HCPCS code currently describes them; CMS proposes to establish separate coding and payment.
- Behavioral health transition. CMS proposes to include smoking and tobacco use cessation and SBIRT (screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment) services in the final year of the timed behavioral health work-RVU transition.
- RHC and FQHC. CMS proposes to recognize Diabetes Self-Management Training and Medical Nutrition Therapy as stand-alone billable RHC visits, and to extend the waiver of in-person requirements for mental health visits at RHCs and FQHCs through December 31, 2027, consistent with the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026.
This is a proposal, and the window closes September 14
None of this is final yet. CMS is taking comments through September 14, 2026, and usually publishes the final rule late in the fall for a January 1 effective date. The same pattern applies here as with the quarterly NCCI edits: the change files and notices are public well ahead of the effective date, and the practices that get surprised are the ones that read them off a denial rather than off the source. Read the proposals that touch your service mix, model the same-day E/M reduction against your own claims, and confirm any code you are about to rebuild a rule around in the Code Book or against a specific encounter in the encoder. None of this changes Medicare Advantage risk adjustment, which runs on a separate track from the fee schedule.
What coders should do now
- 1Model the same-day E/M-plus-procedure reduction against your actual claims. Pull encounters where the same provider or group billed an office/outpatient E/M (often with modifier 25) alongside a 0-, 10-, or 90-day global procedure on the same date, and estimate the revenue delta if the lower-cost service drops to 50%. That is the proposal with the widest reach on a busy procedural schedule.
- 2Flag every claim that currently carries G2211. If the add-on code becomes a 16% modifier, both your capture logic and your fee schedule change, and the codes to touch are the ones appending G2211 today. Confirm the current descriptions in the Code Book before you rebuild the rule.
- 3Separate your advance care planning time now. CMS proposes that 99497 and 99498 report only the billing practitioner's personal time, with new HCPCS codes for clinical-staff ACP. If your notes don't distinguish who did the ACP work, start capturing that split so the codes map cleanly if it's finalized.
- 4Read the remote monitoring proposals if you bill RPM or RTM. CMS proposes to require a separately reportable initiating visit, limit RTM to established patients, and pay only when the service is performed by clinical staff employed by the practice, not a contractor. A device-vendor staffing model may not survive that.
- 5If any of this hits your desk, comment by September 14, 2026. These are proposals, not final policy, and the comment record is the formal channel to push back before CMS writes the final rule.
Frequently Asked Questions
When does the CY 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule take effect?
The policies in the proposed rule would take effect on or after January 1, 2027. CMS issued the proposed rule on July 14, 2026 and is accepting public comments until September 14, 2026. Nothing in it is final until CMS publishes the final rule, which it usually does late in the fall.
What is the proposed CY 2027 Medicare conversion factor?
CMS proposes a qualifying-APM conversion factor of $33.17, a decrease of $0.40 (-1.19%) from the current $33.57, and a non-qualifying-APM conversion factor of $32.84, a decrease of $0.56 (-1.68%) from the current $33.40. The decrease reflects the expiration of the one-year 2.50% increase provided for CY2026 by Public Law 119-21.
Is CMS eliminating G2211 for 2027?
No. CMS proposes to change how G2211 is reported, not to remove it. For CY2027 it would convert the office/outpatient E/M visit complexity add-on from a standalone HCPCS code into a modifier appended to the base E/M code, which would raise the associated E/M payment by 16% across all E/M levels instead of paying a flat add-on amount.
How does the same-day E/M and global surgery proposal work?
When the same physician, or a physician in the same practice, furnishes a separately identifiable office/outpatient E/M visit on the same day as a procedure with a 0-, 10-, or 90-day global period, CMS proposes to pay the most expensive service at 100% and every other service that day at 50%. CMS says the change addresses payment it believes is currently duplicated.
Does the CY2027 PFS proposed rule change Medicare Advantage risk adjustment?
No. The Physician Fee Schedule sets fee-for-service Part B payment for physician services. It does not change ICD-10-CM to HCC mapping, RAF scores, or the risk-adjustment model. A practice that also codes for Medicare Advantage works these fee schedule proposals on the professional-claim side; the risk-adjustment track is separate.
Sources
- Calendar Year (CY) 2027 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule (fact sheet) — Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Jul 14, 2026
- Medicare and Medicaid Programs; CY 2027 Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Changes to Part B Payment and Coverage Policies (CMS-1848-P) — Federal Register, Jul 16, 2026
Related Tools
Jess P., CPC
Certified Professional Coder
Jess reviews HCC Buddy editorial content for accuracy against the current CMS-HCC model and the active FY ICD-10-CM tabular release.
Get CMS Updates in Your Inbox
RADV news, model changes, and coding guidance — within days of CMS publishing, not quarters.
More from CMS Watch
CMS proposes a MIPS activity for AI governance. Its example: AI-generated notes with clinician review.
July 17, 2026
PolicyInsufficient documentation leads Medicare's $28.8B improper-payment bill. It's the coder's fix.
July 11, 2026
PolicyAn AI hit 91% predicting ICD categories. Its scoring counted sepsis for a UTI as correct.
July 10, 2026

