MEAT Review
The checker separates monitor, evaluate, assess, and treat findings so a coder can see which support types are present and which are missing.
Paste deidentified chart wording. HCC Buddy checks MEAT support, risk flags, missing documentation, and a copyable coder summary.
Do not paste PHI.
Remove names, DOB, MRN, member ID, MBI, claim number, address, phone number, and full patient tied dates. The tool blocks likely PHI before AI review.
0/2500 characters. Paste text only. No PDFs in V1.
Try a deidentified example
HCC Buddy’s Evidence Checker helps coders review whether pasted deidentified chart wording contains MEAT support for a diagnosis. It looks for monitoring, evaluation, assessment, and treatment tied to the condition, then flags weak patterns such as mention-only text, history-only diagnoses, medication-list-only support, ruled-out wording, and contradictions.
The result is documentation support guidance, not a final coding, clinical, payment, or CMS compliance determination.
The checker separates monitor, evaluate, assess, and treat findings so a coder can see which support types are present and which are missing.
HPI-only wording, family history, problem-list-only entries, medication reconciliation, screening-only text, and ruled-out conditions are called out before a coder relies on the diagnosis.
Every result stays in a verification posture. Coders still need the full record, valid provider documentation, date of service, and current ICD-10-CM rules.
Use the Evidence Checker before relying on a diagnosis found during chart review. Then confirm the exact ICD-10-CM code in the ICD-10 encoder, review documentation patterns in the MEAT criteria guide, and model impact in the RAF calculator.
The checker reviews pasted deidentified chart wording for MEAT support, risk flags, missing documentation, and whether the wording appears strong enough to support an HCC coding review. It does not make a final coding decision.
No. HCC Buddy provides coder support only. A coder still needs to verify the full record, provider signature, date of service, diagnosis specificity, ICD-10-CM guidance, and payer or audit requirements before final coding.
Weak support commonly comes from mention-only wording, HPI-only text, family history, problem list only, medication list only, history-only diagnoses, ruled-out conditions, possible or suspected wording, and contradictions in the pasted note.