2026 sourcebook
HCC coding and risk adjustment statistics
49 numbers worth keeping, each tied to the original source, date, and qualifier. Use the links below to jump from Medicare Advantage enrollment to payment, audits, or the coding workforce.
Quote the source
Each card links to the original publication and gives the place to find the number.
Keep the qualifier
Dates, populations, and audit scope stay beside the statistic so a clean quote does not become a broad claim.
Take the dataset
Download the JSON with the same source and methodology fields shown here.
Start here
Key takeaways
These six numbers give the quickest read on enrollment, payment, model changes, and audit exposure in 2026.
In March 2026, 35.2 million of 64.2 million Medicare beneficiaries with Parts A and B were enrolled in Medicare Advantage, or 55%.
KFF, June 5, 2026 (updated July 1, 2026)MedPAC estimated that Medicare would spend 14%, or $76 billion, more for Medicare Advantage enrollees in 2026 than if those beneficiaries were in fee-for-service Medicare.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026The 2024 CMS-HCC model has 266 total HCCs and 115 payment HCCs, compared with 204 total HCCs and 86 payment HCCs in the 2020 model.
CMS, December 2024CMS announced targets to expand its medical-coder team from 40 to about 2,000, annual audits from about 60 plans to about 550 eligible plans, and records reviewed per plan from 35 to a range of 35 to 200.
CMS, May 21, 2025OIG estimated that diagnoses found only on health risk assessments or linked chart reviews generated $7.5 billion in 2023 Medicare Advantage risk-adjusted payments for 1.7 million enrollees.
HHS OIG, October 21, 2024HCC Buddy recorded 133,342 strict ICD-10-CM code lookup events from April 11 through July 9, 2026.
HCC Buddy, July 11, 2026
Four definitions before the numbers
- Medicare Advantage
- Private Medicare plans that provide Part A and Part B benefits under contracts with Medicare. Source
- Risk adjustment
- The CMS payment method that adjusts plan payments for the expected cost of enrolled beneficiaries based on demographic and diagnosis information. Source
- Coding intensity
- The difference in measured diagnosis-based risk scores associated with how completely plans document and submit diagnoses. Source
- RADV
- Risk Adjustment Data Validation, the CMS audit process that checks whether diagnoses used for Medicare Advantage payment are supported by medical records. Source
01 · 7 statistics
Enrollment and market
Who is enrolled in Medicare Advantage, which plan types grew, and how concentrated the national market was in 2026.
- #1
In March 2026, 35.2 million of 64.2 million Medicare beneficiaries with Parts A and B were enrolled in Medicare Advantage, or 55%.
Scope: KFF uses March 2026 CMS dashboard data for the national penetration calculation. Dashboard records may change as CMS reconciles them.
KFF, June 5, 2026 (updated July 1, 2026)Figure 1 and the opening enrollment section.
Statistic 1 in this section. - #2
Medicare Advantage enrollment grew by about 1.1 million beneficiaries, or 3%, between March 2025 and March 2026.
Scope: This is March-to-March administrative enrollment.
KFF, June 5, 2026 (updated July 1, 2026)Text immediately following Figure 1.
Statistic 2 in this section. - #3
In March 2026, individual plans open for general enrollment held 21.4 million Medicare Advantage enrollees, equal to 61% of total enrollment.
Scope: The share fell from 62% in March 2025 even as enrollment rose by 0.2 million. KFF excludes plan-county cells with fewer than 11 beneficiaries, about 400,000 people.
KFF, June 5, 2026 (updated July 1, 2026)Figure 3 and the opening paragraph of the individual-plan section.
Statistic 3 in this section. - #4
In March 2026, nearly 8.2 million Medicare beneficiaries were enrolled in Special Needs Plans, equal to 23% of Medicare Advantage enrollment.
Scope: Special Needs Plan enrollment rose by more than 900,000 from March 2025 and represented 85% of net Medicare Advantage enrollment growth. KFF excludes plan-county cells with fewer than 11 beneficiaries.
KFF, June 5, 2026 (updated July 1, 2026)Figure 4 and the first two paragraphs of the Special Needs Plan section.
Statistic 4 in this section. - #5
Chronic Condition Special Needs Plan enrollment reached about 1.7 million people in March 2026, up 45%, or about 518,000 enrollees, from March 2025.
Scope: C-SNPs represented 20% of all Special Needs Plan enrollment. KFF excludes plan-county cells with fewer than 11 beneficiaries.
KFF, June 5, 2026 (updated July 1, 2026)C-SNP paragraph below Figure 4.
Statistic 5 in this section. - #6
Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans held 78% of Special Needs Plan enrollment in March 2026.
Scope: The share was down from 83% in March 2025. KFF excludes plan-county cells with fewer than 11 beneficiaries.
KFF, June 5, 2026 (updated July 1, 2026)D-SNP paragraph below Figure 4.
Statistic 6 in this section. - #7
UnitedHealth Group and Humana together accounted for 46% of Medicare Advantage enrollment in March 2026.
Scope: UnitedHealth held 26%, or 9.3 million enrollees, and Humana held 20%, or 7 million. KFF excludes plan-county cells with fewer than 11 beneficiaries.
KFF, June 5, 2026 (updated July 1, 2026)Figure 6 and the parent-organization market-share section.
Statistic 7 in this section.
02 · 10 statistics
Benefits and payment
Premiums, out-of-pocket limits, plan payments, rebates, and the federal payment outlook for 2026.
- #8
Three quarters of individual Medicare Advantage prescription drug plan enrollees paid no supplemental premium in 2026, and the enrollment-weighted supplemental premium was $15 per month.
Scope: The $15 average includes zero-premium enrollees, excludes the standard Part B premium, and applies to individual MA-PD plans.
KFF, June 5, 2026Figure 1 and the opening premium section.
Statistic 1 in this section. - #9
The average 2026 Medicare Advantage out-of-pocket limit was $5,421 for in-network services, while the PPO combined in-network and out-of-network average was $9,825.
Scope: These are plan limits, not actual enrollee spending.
KFF, June 5, 2026Figure 3 and surrounding text.
Statistic 2 in this section. - #10
Nearly all Medicare Advantage enrollees, 99%, were in plans requiring prior authorization for at least some services in 2026.
Scope: This is the share enrolled in plans with a requirement, not a request or denial rate.
KFF, June 5, 2026Figure 9 and the prior-authorization section.
Statistic 3 in this section. - #11
CMS projected that its final 2026 Medicare Advantage payment policies would raise plan payments by an average of 5.06%, or more than $25 billion, compared with 2025.
Scope: Plan-specific effects vary, and the 5.06% projection excludes the underlying Medicare Advantage coding trend.
CMS, April 7, 2025Opening paragraph and Net Payment Impact table.
Statistic 4 in this section. - #12
CMS expected the underlying Medicare Advantage coding trend to increase average risk scores by 2.10% in 2026.
Scope: This industry-wide average is not included in the 5.06% expected average revenue change.
CMS, April 7, 2025Net Payment Impact, footnote 4.
Statistic 5 in this section. - #13
MedPAC expected Medicare's capitated Medicare Advantage payments to average $16,242 per beneficiary in 2026.
Scope: The expected average includes rebate payments.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026Chapter summary, page 344.
Statistic 6 in this section. - #14
MedPAC projected Medicare Advantage rebate payments of $2,660 per beneficiary in 2026, equal to 15% of total Medicare Advantage payments and more than double the 2018 amount.
Scope: Based on plan bid projections. Rebates finance benefits, premium reductions, administrative expenses, and profit.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026Chapter summary, page 344.
Statistic 7 in this section. - #15
MedPAC projected total Medicare payments to Medicare Advantage plans of $615 billion in 2026.
Scope: This Part C projection includes enrollees with ESRD and excludes separately determined Part D payments. It is not finalized spending.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026Chapter summary, page 347.
Statistic 8 in this section. - #16
MedPAC estimated that Medicare would spend 14%, or $76 billion, more for Medicare Advantage enrollees in 2026 than if those beneficiaries were in fee-for-service Medicare.
Scope: The estimate includes the ESRD population and is not an estimate of plan profit or administrative expense.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026Chapter summary, pages 346 to 347.
Statistic 9 in this section. - #17
MedPAC estimated that higher Medicare Advantage spending would add about $11 billion to Part B premium payments in 2026, roughly $175 per beneficiary for the year or $14.61 per month.
Scope: This is MedPAC's aggregate estimate across all Part B beneficiaries, including beneficiaries in fee-for-service Medicare.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026Chapter summary, page 346.
Statistic 10 in this section.
03 · 8 statistics
Risk model and mappings
How the 2024 CMS-HCC model changed the payment-category structure, code mappings, calibration years, and model blend.
- #18
CMS completed the three-year phase-in of the 2024 CMS-HCC model in 2026, with 100% of non-PACE risk scores calculated under that model.
Scope: This applies to organizations other than PACE and describes the model blend, not a RAF value.
CMS, April 7, 2025Part C Risk Adjustment Model section.
Statistic 1 in this section. - #19
For 2026 PACE payments, CMS blended 10% of the 2024 CMS-HCC model with 90% of the 2017 CMS-HCC model.
Scope: This blend applies only to PACE organizations.
CMS, April 7, 2025Part C Risk Adjustment Model for PACE Organizations.
Statistic 2 in this section. - #20
The 2024 CMS-HCC model has 266 total HCCs and 115 payment HCCs, compared with 204 total HCCs and 86 payment HCCs in the 2020 model.
Scope: These are model-category counts, not counts of ICD-10-CM codes.
CMS, December 2024Table 2-2, pages 18 to 19.
Statistic 3 in this section. - #21
In the model-calibration code universe, the 2024 CMS-HCC model mapped 7,770 of 73,926 ICD-10-CM codes to payment HCCs, or 10.5%, compared with 9,797 codes, or 13.3%, in the 2020 model.
Scope: Uses fiscal year 2022 and 2023 codes available at calibration, not the current fiscal year 2026 code set.
CMS, December 2024Table 2-2, page 18.
Statistic 4 in this section. - #22
CMS reported that the 2024 model newly mapped 209 ICD-10-CM codes to payment HCCs and removed 2,236 codes from payment HCC mappings.
Scope: The added and removed counts are directional mapping changes, not a net code-count calculation.
CMS, December 2024Table 2-2, page 18.
Statistic 5 in this section. - #23
CMS noted that the total ICD-10-CM code set grew from 73,926 codes in the model-calibration data to 74,044 codes in fiscal year 2024.
Scope: These totals include codes that do not map to payment HCCs.
CMS, December 2024Table 2-2 note, page 19.
Statistic 6 in this section. - #24
Across its six community segments, the 2024 CMS-HCC model's individual-level R-squared values ranged from 0.1159 to 0.1889, the highest range among the historical segmented CMS-HCC models CMS compared.
Scope: CMS says subgroup predictive ratios, not R-squared, are the primary accuracy measure for the model's intended use.
CMS, December 2024Section 2.1, page 14.
Statistic 7 in this section. - #25
CMS recalibrated the 2024 CMS-HCC model with 2018 fee-for-service diagnoses and 2019 expenditures, replacing the 2014 diagnosis and 2015 expenditure years used for the prior model.
Scope: These are calibration data years, not 2026 dates of service.
CMS, December 2024Section 2.2.1, page 17.
Statistic 8 in this section.
04 · 6 statistics
Coding intensity and selection
Current MedPAC estimates and peer-reviewed findings on diagnosis capture, favorable selection, plan finances, and chart reviews.
- #26
MedPAC projected that favorable selection would increase 2026 Medicare Advantage payments by roughly 11% above estimated fee-for-service spending, accounting for $57 billion of the $76 billion total payment difference.
Scope: This is a model-based estimate before plan management or coding-intensity effects.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026Chapter summary, page 347.
Statistic 1 in this section. - #27
Before the CMS coding adjustment, MedPAC projected Medicare Advantage risk scores would be about 10% higher than scores for similar fee-for-service beneficiaries in 2026.
Scope: This is a projection, not an audit error rate. MedPAC estimated the V28 phase-in reduced coding intensity by 2.9 percentage points in each year from 2024 through 2026.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026Chapter summary, page 348.
Statistic 2 in this section. - #28
After the 5.9% minimum CMS coding adjustment, MedPAC projected a residual risk-score difference of about 4%, adding an estimated $22 billion to 2026 Medicare Advantage payments.
Scope: The $22 billion is a MedPAC estimate, not a recovery amount or a finding of improper payment.
MedPAC, March 12, 2026Chapter summary, page 348.
Statistic 3 in this section. - #29
A peer-reviewed study estimated that private Medicare plan enrollees generated diagnosis-based risk scores 6% to 16% higher than the same enrollees would have generated in fee-for-service Medicare.
Scope: This is a counterfactual estimate, not a claim that every plan or enrollee was upcoded by that amount.
Journal of Political Economy, January 29, 2020Abstract.
Statistic 4 in this section. - #30
For each $1 of potential Medicare Advantage revenue associated with coding intensity, one study found plan bids fell by $0.10 to $0.19, premiums fell by $0.11 to $0.16, and $0.21 to $0.45 went toward lower medical loss ratios.
Scope: Regression associations using 2008 to 2015 administrative data and prescription-drug utilization as an independent health-risk proxy.
Health Services Research, November 9, 2020Abstract, Principal Findings, and Tables 1 and 2.
Statistic 5 in this section. - #31
A study associated chart reviews with $2.3 billion in added Medicare Advantage payments in 2015, equal to a 3.7% spending increase, with 10% of contracts accounting for 42% of the added payments.
Scope: Cross-sectional analysis of 14,021,692 beneficiaries in 510 contracts. The authors could not validate added diagnoses against medical records.
Medical Care, February 1, 2021Abstract, Results, and Figure 1.
Statistic 6 in this section.
05 · 11 statistics
RADV and oversight
Audit plans and tightly scoped CMS and OIG findings. Sample results stay labeled as samples and estimates stay labeled as estimates.
- #32
CMS announced targets to expand its medical-coder team from 40 to about 2,000, annual audits from about 60 plans to about 550 eligible plans, and records reviewed per plan from 35 to a range of 35 to 200.
Scope: These were announced targets. The source does not prove CMS achieved them.
CMS, May 21, 2025Key Elements of the Plan, Workforce Expansion and Increased Audit Volume.
Statistic 1 in this section. - #33
CMS's March 2026 schedule listed six planned RADV audit initiations covering payment years 2020 through 2025, with starts scheduled from March 2026 through April 2027.
Scope: CMS says dates are subject to change and payment years may be audited out of sequence.
CMS, March 4, 2026One-page audit schedule table.
Statistic 2 in this section. - #34
OIG estimated that diagnoses found only on health risk assessments or linked chart reviews generated $7.5 billion in 2023 Medicare Advantage risk-adjusted payments for 1.7 million enrollees.
Scope: Based on 2022 encounter data. OIG did not find that all $7.5 billion was improper.
HHS OIG, October 21, 2024Estimated Risk-Adjusted Payments, page 1, Exhibit 2.
Statistic 3 in this section. - #35
In-home health risk assessments and linked chart reviews accounted for 63%, or $4.7 billion, of OIG's $7.5 billion payment estimate.
Scope: The linked chart-review amount includes reviews connected to assessments conducted in any setting.
HHS OIG, October 21, 2024Page 1, Exhibit 2 and note.
Statistic 4 in this section. - #36
OIG estimated $1,869 in risk-adjusted payments per in-home health risk assessment record, compared with $365 per facility-based assessment record.
Scope: Estimated from 2022 encounter data. Record shares are not enrollee shares.
HHS OIG, October 21, 2024Page 2, Exhibits 3 and 4.
Statistic 5 in this section. - #37
Thirteen health conditions accounted for $5.6 billion, or 75%, of OIG's health-risk-assessment-related payment estimate.
Scope: The lack of another service record for the diagnosis does not prove every diagnosis was invalid.
HHS OIG, October 21, 2024Top Health Conditions, page 3, Exhibit 5.
Statistic 6 in this section. - #38
Twenty Medicare Advantage companies generated 80% of OIG's $7.5 billion health-risk-assessment payment estimate while covering 50% of Medicare Advantage enrollees.
Scope: A disproportionate payment share is not by itself proof of miscoding. OIG listed the 20 companies in Appendix C, Exhibit C-1.
HHS OIG, October 21, 2024Top MA Companies, pages 4 to 5, Exhibit 7.
Statistic 7 in this section. - #39
OIG found 19,028 Medicare Advantage enrollees with no 2022 encounter record other than one health risk assessment, associated with an estimated $81.9 million in payments.
Scope: Encounter data can be incomplete. This finding does not establish that every enrollee received no care.
HHS OIG, October 21, 2024MA Enrollees With No Other 2022 Service Records, pages 7 to 8, Exhibit 11.
Statistic 8 in this section. - #40
In a targeted Priority Health audit, OIG found unsupported diagnoses in 252 of 300 sampled enrollee-years and calculated $828,010 in sample net overpayments.
Scope: Do not convert this targeted sample result into a plan-wide error rate.
HHS OIG, March 31, 2026Findings, pages 7 to 8, and Appendix C, Tables 4 and 5.
Statistic 9 in this section. - #41
OIG's 2026 acute-stroke audit examined a high-risk population of 240,401 enrollees across 554 Medicare Advantage organizations, associated with $477,460,953 in payments for the selected HCC.
Scope: The population was selected for a specific record pattern and does not represent all stroke coding.
HHS OIG, May 28, 2026How We Conducted This Audit, page 5, and Appendix A, page 11.
Statistic 10 in this section. - #42
None of the 97 relevant sampled acute-stroke HCCs in OIG's targeted audit were validated: 93 were unsupported by supplied records and four records could not be located.
Scope: The sample was deliberately restricted to a high-risk pattern. Missing records differ from reviewed records that did not support a diagnosis.
HHS OIG, May 28, 2026Findings, pages 5 to 6, and Appendix C, Tables 3 and 4.
Statistic 11 in this section.
06 · 7 statistics
Coding work and HCC Buddy data
National workforce benchmarks plus four aggregate-only HCC Buddy measurements with fixed dates and publication thresholds.
- #43
The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated 194,720 employed medical records specialists in May 2025.
Scope: Wage-and-salary workers only. Self-employed workers and unpaid family workers are excluded.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 15, 2026Table 1, PDF page 13, Medical records specialists row.
Statistic 1 in this section. - #44
The May 2025 national mean wage for medical records specialists was $27.30 per hour and $56,790 annually.
Scope: Annual mean wages use a 2,080-hour work year and exclude overtime, benefits, and certain bonuses.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 15, 2026Table 1, PDF page 13, Medical records specialists row.
Statistic 2 in this section. - #45
The May 2025 median hourly wage for medical records specialists was $24.59.
Scope: The national estimate combines six survey panels collected over three years.
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, May 15, 2026Table 1, PDF page 13, Medical records specialists row.
Statistic 3 in this section. - #46HCC Buddy original data
HCC Buddy recorded 133,342 strict ICD-10-CM code lookup events from April 11 through July 9, 2026.
Scope: Eligible events in a fixed 90-day window, not unique coders or patients.
HCC Buddy, July 11, 2026originalData.statistics[0] in the JSON dataset.
Statistic 4 in this section. - #47HCC Buddy original data
From April 11 through July 9, 2026, HCC Buddy recorded strict ICD-10-CM lookup events across 1,316 official three-character code families.
Scope: Dots were removed before grouping, and each family was checked against the official fiscal year 2026 ICD-10-CM tabular.
HCC Buddy, July 11, 2026originalData.statistics[1] in the JSON dataset.
Statistic 5 in this section. - #48HCC Buddy original data
E11 (Type 2 diabetes mellitus) was the leading code family with 5,602 events, or 4.2% of eligible lookups.
Scope: An aggregate lookup count from official fiscal year 2026 code families, not a prevalence estimate or patient count.
HCC Buddy, July 11, 2026originalData.statistics[2] in the JSON dataset; label checked in the fiscal year 2026 CMS tabular and icd10-hcc MCP.
Statistic 6 in this section. - #49HCC Buddy original data
The ten leading ICD-10-CM families accounted for 25,619 events, or 19.2% of eligible lookups.
Scope: Based on the same fixed 90-day event window and official fiscal year 2026 family filter.
HCC Buddy, July 11, 2026originalData.statistics[3] in the JSON dataset.
Statistic 7 in this section.
How this sourcebook was built
Public figures were transcribed from the linked original publication or source analysis. Each entry keeps the publication date, exact locator, and scope note beside the number. CMS projections, MedPAC estimates, research findings, and OIG audit results are labeled as different kinds of evidence.
The four HCC Buddy figures were generated by a committed script. Lookup results use aggregate event counts in a fixed 90-day window, a strict code-shaped filter, the official fiscal year 2026 three-character category list, and a minimum published cell count of 25. No user-level queries, user identifiers, or patient information are included.
A source can revise a live page after this sourcebook is reviewed. Check the linked publication before using a number in policy, audit, or financial work.
Source table
Frequently asked questions
Where do these HCC coding statistics come from?
The public statistics come from CMS, OIG, MedPAC, KFF, and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The four HCC Buddy statistics come from aggregate lookup events. Every entry names its source, publication date, locator, and any limit that matters when quoting it.
Can I cite a statistic from this page?
Yes. Cite the original source linked under the statistic, not HCC Buddy, unless the entry is marked HCC Buddy original data. Keep the date and qualifier with the number so the scope does not get lost.
Does an HCC Buddy lookup count represent a patient or coder?
No. It represents an eligible lookup event inside the fixed 90-day measurement window. The aggregate does not count unique coders or patients, and no user-level query data is published.
Last reviewed 2026-07-11
Reviewed by Jess P., CPC
Found a newer release or a source that changed? Send the original link through the contact page.

